Skip to main content

Lost pensions worth billions unclaimed

Over the past six years, the number of lost pension pots has doubled to around 3.3 million. The total value of missing funds now sits at almost £31 billion.

A pension pot is considered to be lost when the pension provider administering the fund is unable to contact the saver who owns the pension pot.

How do pension pots get lost?

Savers may have worked for many different employers during their working life with some employments only for relatively brief periods. The small pension pots from these short tenures can easily be overlooked, especially if they arose many years prior to retirement:

  • The loss of contact will often happen because of a saver moving house and not updating the provider with a new address.
  • If the saver then loses track of the pension provider, there is no easy way for them to be reunited with their pension pot.

 Tracing pension pots

The first step to tracing a lost pension pot is for you to contact the employer associated with the pot; this is only an option, of course, if that employer is still active.

If the employer route is a dead end, then there are various pension tracing services available. For example, the government’s pension tracing service will find contact details for a lost pension, such as a workplace pension or a personal pension scheme.

The pension tracing service is, however, only of use if you have the name of either the relevant employer or pension provider. Also, the service will only provide contact details; it will not tell you whether you actually have a pension to claim.

In some cases, a private pension tracing service might be the only option available. They will have access to a large database of information to help with the search.

The government’s service to find pension contact details can be found here.

Photo by Tim Hüfner on Unsplash

How to raise £10,000,000,000

With a ‘black hole’ of £22 billion to fill, there are plenty of groups giving Rachel Reeves advice.

The Fabian Society published a report on taxation on August Bank Holiday Monday. While their main audience is in Scotland, which has its summer bank holiday at the start of August rather than at the end, the timing was unusual. Nevertheless, that was the date chosen by the Fabian Society to release Expensive and Unequal. The case for reforming pension tax (2024).

The Fabian Society is one of the Labour party’s original founders and remains an affiliate to this day. Like several other left-leaning think tanks, post-election what it says has suddenly started to attract more attention. This is especially true on the issue of tax ahead of the Budget on 30 October.

The Society’s pension proposals are wide-ranging, but all of them have appeared before in one form or another. Taken together, the Society suggests that they could raise £10 billion a year. To put that in context, the controversial decision to means-test Winter Fuel Payments will save about £1.5 billion a year in 2025/26.

The most significant element of the proposals is the introduction of a flat rate tax credit to replace income tax relief on pension contributions. This idea was once allegedly considered by George Osborne, the former Conservative chancellor. For example:

  • At present, a higher-rate taxpayer (42% in Scotland, 40% elsewhere in the UK) pays £60 (£58 in Scotland) to add £100 to their pension.
  • Alternatively, the Fabian Society suggests a personal contribution of £75 from net income would receive a £25 government tax credit, bringing the total to £100. This is similar to a Lifetime Individual Savings Account.

Such a reform would benefit most taxpayers, who would see the net cost of their pension contributions drop. It would also reduce the tax benefit given to higher and additional rate taxpayers, who according to the most recent HMRC calculations (for 2022/23) receive just over half of all pension contribution tax relief.

Most of the Fabian Society’s tax-raising ideas were likely already under consideration by the Treasury. Regardless of whether they are included in the Budget on 30 October, they are worth noting if you are contemplating topping up your pension.

Find out more about the Fabian Society’s report here.

Photo by Mark Timberlake on Unsplash

Not in the NIC of time

A useful new web tool has emerged, a little late in the game, in a joint effort from two government departments.

In early 2023, HMRC and the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) found they were unable to cope with the volume generated by a 5 April cut-off date that had been set a decade previously. The deadline related to the option to pay backdated National Insurance contributions (NICs) to fill in gaps in contribution records going back to 2006/7, rather than the standard six-year period. Media coverage of the option – often quoting the more extreme examples of benefit – had prompted a surge of last-minute interest, which the departments were unable to manage.

After denying there was a problem, the government finally revealed a band-aid solution in March, pushing the deadline out to 31 July 2023. This solution came unstuck about three months later when, still unable to cope with requests for information, the deadline was extended again to 5 April 2025 – two years after the original cut-off date.

One of the biggest issues causing delays was the difficulty in obtaining details of contribution gaps from the DWP (unavailable online) and then paying HMRC the appropriate amount. Now, at long last, a ‘fully end-to-end digital solution’ has been launched by the DWP and HMRC under the banner Check your State Pension forecast. It is not a complete solution, because it will not work if you are beyond the State pension age (presently 66 years), self-employed or currently living outside the UK with gaps incurred while working abroad. You will also need to have a Personal Tax Account with HMRC to log in (or register for one first with GOV.UK).

If you think you might have missed contributions going back to April 2006, it is well worth taking a few minutes to check your position with the new tool. To fill in one year’s missing contribution (before the 2023/24 tax years) costs £824.20 and could mean an extra £328.64 a year in State pension.

Photo by Keith Tanner on Unsplash

Election tax stories…………………

It’s early days yet, but some pointers on tax have emerged from both the main parties.

Within one week of the surprise firing of the general election starting gun, both the Conservatives and Labour have been promoting their tax plans. We can expect more to emerge in the coming weeks and in the manifestos, which will probably appear during the second week of June.

The Conservatives were first out of the blocks with a new tax proposal – higher personal allowances for pensioners. The driver for this is, ironically, an existing Conservative policy, the freezing of personal allowances until April 2028. At present the new State pension (£221.20 a week – £11,502 a year) is below the personal allowance (£12,570). However, given the State pension rises each year in line with the triple lock, it is destined to overtake the personal allowance in the future. As a result, a pensioner with only State pension would have tax to pay.

Mr Sunak’s solution is ‘triple lock plus’, which would see the personal allowance rise in line with the State pension increases, but only for those who have reached State pension age. The cost would be £2.4 billion a year by 2029/30, which the Conservatives said would be funded by that favourite revenue source of politicians seeking re-election, clamping down on tax avoidance.

Rachel Reeves, the Shadow Chancellor, subsequently said that the Labour party would not copy the personal allowance reform. She already has tax avoidance measures earmarked to replace the revenue she had planned to raise from increased tax on non-domiciled individuals. The non-domiciled option was effectively closed off by Chancellor of the Exchequer Jeremy Hunt’s March 2024 Budget, which had its own (similar) ‘non-dom’ proposals.

The Labour party has also responded to Conservative campaign rhetoric with pledges not to increase income tax, National Insurance, corporation tax or value added tax, removing major revenue-raising options.

Budget plans?

On the subject of Budgets, the Shadow Chancellor was asked whether she would hold an emergency Budget if she entered 11 Downing Street. She replied that there would be no Budget without a report from the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) – a sideswipe at the Truss Mini-Budget which lacked any OBR oversight. The OBR requires a minimum of ten weeks’ notice to prepare a report, meaning that there will be no Reeves’ Budget until mid-September, at the earliest. The corollary is that August could be a busy month for tax planning.

Photo by Manny Becerra on Unsplash

How much does retirement cost?

New research has put some surprising numbers on the income needed in retirement.

Each year since 2019, the Pensions and Lifetime Savings Association (PLSA) has set about answering the question of how much retirement costs for couples and single retirees. It considers three different Retirement Living Standards, which are summarised as:

  • Minimum: covers all your needs with some disposable income.
  • Moderate: more financial security and flexibility.
  • Comfortable: more financial freedom and some luxuries.

To give a more granular idea of what the different standards imply, these are how two sub-categories break down for food and drink, holidays and leisure:

  MINIMUM MODERATE COMFORTABLE
 Food and drink

·       Around £95 a week on groceries.

·       £50 a month per couple on food outside of the home.

·       £30 a month per couple on takeaways.

·       Around £100 a week on groceries.

·       £60 a week per couple on food outside of the home.

·       £20 a week per couple on takeaways.

·       £100 a month to take others out for a monthly meal.

·       Around £130 a week on food.

·       £80 a week per couple on food outside of the home.

·       £30 a week per couple on takeaways.

·       £100 a month to take others out for a monthly meal.

Holidays and leisure

·       A week-long UK holiday.

·       Basic TV and broadband plus a streaming service.

·       A fortnight three-star,
all-inclusive holiday in the Mediterranean and a long weekend break in
the UK.

·       Basic TV and broadband plus two streaming services.

·       A fortnight
four-star holiday in the Mediterranean with spending money and three long weekend breaks in
the UK.

·       Extensive bundled broadband
and TV subscription.

For the first time since 2019, the Moderate and Comfortable standards have been ‘rebased’ to allow for changed spending patterns. For example, out went two cars for the Comfortable standard and in came much higher spending on clothes in the Moderate standard. The rebasing means the gap between the 2023- and 2022-income requirements reflects more than just inflation – leading to the 34% jump for the Moderate single income requirement.

The bottom-line costs shown in the graph below are net (after-tax) income requirements and take no account of any rental expenditure. As a reminder, from April 2024 the new State pension will be £11,502 a year.

Source and credit to: Pensions and Lifetime Savings Association

 

An uncertain future for the Triple Lock

In mid-September, the Office for National Statistics (ONS) published the latest earnings data, covering the period May to July 2023. Earnings data has been the focus of much attention recently because a fall in the pace of pay growth is seen as a pre-condition for the Bank of England to consider a pause – and eventually cuts – in interest rates. However, the data that emerged in September was doubly important as, in theory, it sets the level of increase for the old and new state pension from April 2024.

Both the old and new state pensions are subject to the Triple Lock, which means they are due to increase by the greater of:

  • Annual earnings growth (including bonuses) for the May to July period;
  • Annual CPI inflation to September; or
  • 5%.

Given the publicity it receives, you may be surprised to learn that the Triple Lock is nowhere to be found in pensions legislation. The Triple Lock is a discretionary feature that the government can ignore, although with an election almost certain in 2024, it would be difficult to imagine that it would depart much from its requirement this year.

May to July earnings total earnings growth this year was 8.5%, 0.3% higher than expected, a surprise that the ONS attributed to NHS and civil service one-off payments in June and July. That means from next April the old state pension will rise by £13.30 to £169.50 a week and the new state pension (applying to those who reach state pension age after 5 April 2016) will increase by £17.35 to £221.20 a week, unless the government decides to suspend the Triple Lock. It did so in 2022/23, when Covid-19 distorted earnings data and for 2024/25 it could tweak the earnings definition to exclude those one-off payments.

Whether the Triple Lock will survive beyond the next election is unclear. Shortly before the earnings data was published, the Prime Minister refused to commit to the Triple Lock being in the Conservative manifesto. At about the same time, the Institute for Fiscal Studies published a critical report saying that the Triple Lock created uncertainty both for the government and for individuals planning their retirement.

If you find yourself thinking you could retire on £221 a week, think again. It represents less than two thirds of this year’s 35-hour week National Minimum Wage.

Source: IFS.

Mitigating rising corporation tax rates

New HMRC statistics have shed some light on how many companies are affected by the recent hike in corporation tax rates. Just over 1.5 million companies paid corporation tax for the financial year to 31 March 2022, but only 7% fell above the £50,000 small profits threshold.

Although fewer than 100,000 companies are likely to be facing the 26.5% marginal rate of corporation tax where profits fall between £50,000 and £250,000, they will be mainly owner-managed companies with owners keen to mitigate the tax increase.

For a company with a 31 March year end and profits of £200,000, this year’s corporation tax bill is going to be £11,250 higher than last year.

Director’s self-invested personal pension (SIPP)

Even if a director has not previously been in favour of making sizable pension contributions, there can now be a compelling case for doing so.

  • With a marginal tax rate of 26.5%, investing the maximum £60,000 into a SIPP will save corporation tax of £15,900.
  • Once the director reaches 55, 25% of the pension fund can be withdrawn tax free, but virtually immediately if a director is already 55.
  • There will be an overall tax saving if the tax rate eventually paid on pension withdrawals – taking into account the tax-free element – is less than 26.5%.

Even if there is no overall tax advantage as such, there will still be a timing benefit. The current year’s corporation tax bill is cut, but the tax cost does not apply until the director receives their pension income.

Mitigating cost and risk

By choosing a low-cost provider, the annual cost of maintaining a SIPP can be kept to a minimum.

If there are only a few years until retirement, a director might not want to be exposed to stock market volatility. This risk can be avoided by investing in fixed-term cash deposit accounts.

A basic guide to SIPPs can be found here.

Photo by micheile henderson on Unsplash

Deferring your state pension

The current state pension age (SPA) – the earliest age at which you can draw your state pension – is 66. It will be gradually increased to 67 between April 2026 and April 2028. A further rise to 68 is due, probably between 2037 and 2039, but the confirmation of that timing has (conveniently) been delayed until after the next general election.

Most people draw their state pension as soon as it becomes available, which requires a claim to be made. If you do not make that claim, your state pension is automatically deferred until you choose to claim it. Up until then your deferred pension will increase every week you defer, provided you defer for at least nine weeks. The rate of increase is the equivalent of 1% for every nine weeks, which works out at just under 5.8% a year.

For example, if you defer the current state pension of £203.85 a week for 52 weeks you would receive an extra £11.82 a week once it started before adding the normal inflation related uplift. The increase is not compounded, so for two years’ deferral the extra would be £23.64, and so on.

5.8% a year does not sound bad, but don’t forget, your higher pension will be paid for a shorter period, as it started later. It can take a long time for the extra payments to overtake the loss of the full pension in the deferred period. For example, for a one-year deferral you will need to wait until you are about 81 before the total pension payments you have received are higher because of deferral, assuming 2.5% CPI inflation.

Nevertheless, there can be good reasons to defer. For example, if you are still working, your state pension would attract tax at your highest rate(s) which could be lower once you fully retire. There are other tax planning situations where being able to minimise income in a tax year can be useful, for example when cashing in an investment bond. Before you claim your state pension, make sure you take all your circumstances into consideration.

Government guidance on deferring your state pension can be found here.

Photo by Tim Hüfner on Unsplash

Abolishing the pensions lifetime allowance

Although the lifetime allowance was effectively abolished from April 2023 as the lifetime allowance charge was removed, it has been retained on statute for a year to allow time for the intricacies to be ironed out. Draft legislation, to take effect from 6 April 2024, has now been published.

With the lifetime allowance abolished, the problem faced by the legislators was how to tax lump sums and death benefits in its absence. They have overcome this by introducing a new lump sum and death benefit allowance, which, not surprisingly, is the same amount as the old lifetime allowance – £1,073,100.

If the draft legislation is enacted, the most significant changes will be in the way death benefits are taxed when a pension saver dies before age 75.

Death benefits – lump sum

A beneficiary can generally receive lump sum death benefits tax free if the pension hasn’t been accessed (uncrystallised).

  • Previously, any excess over the lifetime allowance was taxed at the rate of 55%.
  • From 2024/25, the excess over the new lump sum and death benefit allowance will be taxed at the beneficiary’s marginal rate of tax.

This is as intended when the changes were announced.

Death benefits – Income

What was not announced alongside the initial abolition news is the proposed approach to taxing uncrystallised death benefits taken as income – either by drawdown or an annuity. Previously, the pension income was exempt from tax. From 2024/25, the proposed legislation will see pension income taxed in full at the beneficiary’s marginal rate of tax.

The new rules are broadly neutral if a pension saver dies after reaching age 75, but the tax treatment could be potentially worse from 6 April 2024 for those that die younger.

Given the more advantageous tax treatment if uncrystallised funds are taken as a lump sum (completely exempt if less than the new lump sum and death benefit allowance), this could push more beneficiaries into taking a lump sum even where income would be more suitable for their needs.

HMRC’s policy paper on the abolition of the lifetime allowance can be found here.

Photo by Huy Phan on Unsplash

Let’s talk about the National insurance gap extension

The normal time limit for a person to fill gaps in their national insurance (NI) record is six years, but transitional arrangements allow gaps to be filled back to 2006/07. The deadline for making such contributions was recently extended to 31 July 2023, but has now been extended to 5 April 2025.

The deadline has been delayed because people have been finding it difficult to get through on pension helplines once the July deadline received a publicity boost. The transitional arrangement will now apply for the years 2006/07 to 2017/18.

Voluntary NI contributions for the years 2006/07 to 2017/18 paid by 5 April 2025 will be at the 2022/23 rate of £15.85 a week, even though the rate is currently £17.45.

Contribution record

The first step is for a person to check their state pension forecast and NI record. This can easily be done online.

  • Voluntary contributions will not always increase the amount of state pension. The decision can be especially complex if contracted out of the state pension prior to 2016.
  • A person in very poor health or with a short life expectancy will probably not benefit from voluntary contributions.

Personalised advice can be obtained by contacting the Future Pension Centre (if not yet at state pension age) or the Pension Service (if already receiving the state pension).

The benefit

A person needs 35 qualifying years on their NI record to qualify for the full state pension, which is currently £10,600 a year. To add a full year the cost is £824, but this will boost annual pension entitlement by some £303 – a very respectable return for someone who then enjoys at least five years of retirement.

The return will be even better if partially complete years can be filled since these might only require a few missing weeks – at £15.85 per week – to be paid.

A state pension forecast can be obtained here.

Photo by Diana Parkhouse on Unsplash