Skip to main content

High Income Child Benefit Charge: penalties and defaults

New data reveals that penalties issued by HMRC for not paying the High-Income Child Benefit Charge (HICBC), or paying the incorrect amount, have fallen significantly. However, the number of individuals still in default is estimated at more than 60,000.

If the HICBC is payable, an individual is required to submit a self-assessment tax return each year even if all of their income is taxed through PAYE.

  • Such individuals are unlikely to receive professional advice, so there is a lack of awareness.
  • Salary increases can lead to someone becoming subject to the charge, especially as the income limit has remained at £50,000 since the charge was introduced.

Complications

The HICBC can apply if either partner has income over £50,000. The definition of a partnership for this purpose includes people living together.

The charge falls on the partner with the higher income, and in many cases, one partner will not know what the other partner’s income is, especially if they have separated.

Although child benefit is normally paid to the person the child is living with, it is possible for the other partner to make the claim if they are contributing at least as much as the amount of the child benefit towards the child’s upkeep.

Moving in or out

Where a partner (B) moves in or out (with partner A) the position is:

  • Partner B moves in: Partner A could become liable to the HICBC, but only from when partner B moved in. Partner B will take over partner A’s HICBC if they have the higher income.
  • Partner B moves out: If partner A has the higher income, they will only be liable for the HICBC up to the date partner B moves out.

Self-assessment

Given the 31 January deadline for filing the 2021/22 tax return, individuals should urgently review their situation to ensure any HICBC is correctly declared. This is also the deadline for amending the 2020/21 return without the need to write to HMRC.

Failure to pay the HICBC, or paying the incorrect amount, will mean backdated assessments, often for considerable sums, plus, if no reasonable excuse, late notification penalties.

HMRC’s basic guide to the HICBC can be found here.

Photo by Sigmund on Unsplash

The effects of fiscal drag on your tax position

Fiscal drag is the stealthy way in which governments pull more and more taxpayers into higher tax brackets without the backlash that comes with increased tax rates. This is something taxpayers can probably live with when inflation is negligible, but it’s another matter entirely with inflation at over 11%.

Inheritance tax

One of the starkest examples of fiscal drag is the freezing of the inheritance tax (IHT) nil rate band that has been set at £325,000 since April 2009. Combined with soaring property prices, it is no surprise the government’s IHT receipts have nearly doubled in the ten years to 2021/22, with current year receipts set to see a further significant increase.

The nil rate band had previously been frozen at £325,000 until 2026, but the Autumn Statement has now extended the freeze until 2028.

IHT bills can sometimes be mitigated with careful lifetime planning, although people should be careful not to leave themselves short of funds later in life.

Income tax thresholds

The personal allowance (£12,570) and the basic rate tax threshold (£37,700) are unchanged since 2021/22, and, like the IHT nil rate band, are now set to remain frozen until 2028. Other thresholds are subject to fiscal drag because the government simply ignores them from year to year.

  • The £100,000 income limit at which the personal allowance starts to be withdrawn is unchanged since withdrawal was introduced in 2010. Personal allowance withdrawal leads to a 60% marginal tax rate, and an estimated one million more taxpayers could be caught if nothing changes over the next five years.
  • The High Income Child Benefit Charge income limit of £50,000 is unchanged since the charge was introduced in 2013. Around one in five families are now affected by the limit, compared to one in eight when the charge was first introduced.

To mitigate the impact of these frozen thresholds, some income tax planning may be possible for spouses and civil partners. Pension contributions can also reduce the amount of income counting towards the various income limits.

Details of income tax rates and personal allowances for the current tax year can be found here.

Photo by Kyle Glenn on Unsplash

Setting new taxpayer records

New data from HMRC reveals there are now over six million people paying higher or additional rate tax in the UK.

In recent years, the end of June has been the time for HMRC to issue its annual statistics on taxpayer numbers. This series is more up to date than some of HMRC’s releases and includes a projection for the current tax year.

The latest set of data received more press attention than usual for several reasons:

  • The number of income tax payers jumped by 1.3 million (4%) for 2022/23, the largest increase since 2004/05.
  • Higher rate taxpayer numbers rose by 750,000 (16%), an increase unmatched in over 30 years of HMRC data.
  • The population of additional rate taxpayers grew by 66,000 (12%). When the additional rate of tax was introduced in 2010/11, only 0.75% of taxpayers were in this lofty band, a proportion that has since grown to 1.75%.
  • Add together higher and additional rate taxpayers and the total exceeds 6.1 million, over one in six of all income taxpayers.

This means there are more taxpayers than ever before and more of them are paying higher and additional rates due to a combination of two main factors:

  1. The then Chancellor Rishi Sunak’s decision in March 2021 to freeze the personal allowance, higher rate and additional rate thresholds from 2021/22 through to 2025/26. In fact, the additional rate threshold has never moved from its initial £150,000.
  2. Inflation has been vastly higher than anticipated back in March 2021, when the CPI rate was running at 0.7% (a year, not a month) and the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) was projecting that it would not reach 2% until 2025. The OBR’s projection for total inflation over the four years from the start of 2022 to the end of 2025 was 7.7%, a figure that is almost certain to be below what 2022 alone will deliver.

The winner in all of this is the Treasury, so much so that there is now talk of tax cuts being announced in the Autumn Budget, if not sooner. As with July’s ‘tax cut’ in National Insurance contributions, any new income tax cut will be a reduction in the size of the previously planned increase.

Meanwhile, if you have become a higher rate taxpayer this year, you should make sure you are using all available reliefs and allowances to the full. The one piece of good news is that tax relief on your pension contributions has potentially doubled.

Source: HMRC.

Has a 60% income tax rate reappeared?

The high marginal tax rates created by phasing out the personal allowance are back in the news.

‘A million to pay 60% income tax within years,’ ran a recent headline in The Sunday Telegraph. The next day The Times picked up on the same story with the article ‘Inflation may leave million more workers paying 60% tax’.

How the 60% tax rate happens

In 2022/23, Yasmin expects to have an income of £100,000 and is therefore entitled to a personal allowance of £12,570. If she receives an unexpected bonus of £10,000, her total income will be £110,000 and her personal allowance will be reduced by half of the amount by which her total income exceeds £100,000 – i.e. £5,000. As a result, she will not only pay tax of £4,000 on her bonus (at 40% outside Scotland), but she will also have to pay £2,000 of tax on the £5,000 of her income no longer covered by the personal allowance. The result is:

   Total extra tax          =    £4,000 + £2,000 x 100% = 60%
Total extra income                £10,000

If Yasmin received a bonus of over £25,140, she would lose all her personal allowance.

Whether either article counts as ‘news’ is debatable. The 60% income tax rate (or 61.5% on earnings in Scotland) has been around, in one form or another, since 2010/11. It is not, as The Times suggested, the result of ‘a glitch in the personal allowance regime’ but was the product of a carefully crafted piece of legislation. At the time, the aim was to raise extra revenue while keeping the threshold for the newly introduced 50% additional rate tax at £150,000.

The newspaper articles indirectly highlighted that:

  • The £100,000 threshold at which the personal allowance is tapered has been unchanged since 2010; and
  • The personal allowance has almost doubled since 2010, resulting in a £25,140 band of income in which the 60% rate can bite.

Both factors mean that more taxpayers are being caught as incomes rise over time.

The one piece of good news is that if you are hit by 60% income tax you may also be able to claim 60% tax relief on pension contributions or gift aid.

Photo by Jon Tyson on Unsplash

Can the child benefit charge be fixed?

A critical review of how the government taxes child benefits has raised a major question mark over HMRC’s approach to collecting payments.

Child benefit tax, or the High-Income Child Benefit Charge (HICBC) to use its legal name, is a case study in how not to introduce and operate a tax. It was designed as a quick fix to political pressure for the withdrawal of child benefit from high earners during a period of austerity.

When the HICBC was introduced in January 2013 – not even the start of a tax year – broadly speaking, it applied if either parent had ‘adjusted net income’ of over £50,000. At the time, the higher rate income tax threshold throughout the UK was £42,475, meaning the ‘high income’ label had some meaning. The threshold has remained at £50,000 ever since, with the result that, outside Scotland, it has now been overtaken by the higher rate threshold (£50,270 in 2022/23). A corollary is that the proportion of families affected has increased over the period from one in eight to one in five, according to the Institute for Fiscal Studies.

In a recent review, the OTS has been highly critical of HICBC and the convoluted way in which HMRC collects the tax. The OTS notes that in 2019/20, HMRC opened over 125,000 compliance checks on ‘customers’ who it suspected had not paid the correct amount of HICBC. The OTS report also noted that HMRC had written to 94,000 potentially affected people in 2020/21, many of whom could face shock tax bills in the near future.

The HICBC is structured as a tax charge equal to 1% of child benefit received for each £100 of income above the £50,000 threshold. So, for example, if you have:

  • two children and are entitled to child benefit of £36.25 a week (£1,865 a year); and
  • your ‘adjusted net income’ is £54,000; then
  • you face a tax charge of £754 (£1,865 @ 40%).

At £60,000 or more of income, the tax charge matches the child benefit, making it sensible to opt for non-payment of the benefit. However, you or your partner should still register for child benefit because it gives entitlement to national insurance credits.

In some circumstances, it is possible to use tax planning to limit or even sidestep the HICBC completely, but given the charges’ complexities, doing so requires professional advice.

HMRC: Upper Tribunal deems child benefit discovery assessments invalid

A discovery assessment can be made by HMRC where income, which should have been assessed, has not been assessed for tax purposes. A recent decision in an Upper Tribunal case, however, found that neither child benefit, nor the related charge, is defined as income, thereby restricting HMRC’s use of discovery assessments to collect underpaid tax.

The high income child benefit charge (HICBC) applies to anyone who receives child benefit when their income, or their partner’s income, exceeds £50,000. Many have been caught out thinking the charge doesn’t apply to them or because they are unaware of their partner’s finances.

Individuals who pay tax under PAYE may never have needed to fill in a tax return. However, they are required to do so just to report the HICBC.

The decision

Jason Wilkes owed around £4,200 in unpaid taxes as a result of being subject to the HICBC for the tax years 2014/15 to 2016/17. Crucial to the decision was that Wilkes had not filed returns for these years or been issued with a notice to file.

HMRC raised discovery assessments to collect the tax due. However, since no income as such was ‘discovered’, the assessments raised were invalid.

Refunds all round?

The answer, sadly, is no. Discovery assessments are valid if tax returns have been submitted but the HICBC omitted; there is then ‘income’. This will be the case for many taxpayers.

It seems unfair that those complying with the law are at a disadvantage to those who have not. However, this is down to HMRC relying on discovery assessments rather than issuing a notice to file tax returns.

If you have been required to pay the HICBC for prior years then check to see if you fit the refund criteria: tax returns not filed, with discovery assessments used to collect the tax due.

Details of the high income child benefit charge can be found here. Let me know if you’d like to know more – or require assistance in this space.

Photo by Noble Mitchell on Unsplash