Skip to main content

Some ‘new’ tax year opportunities

“A bit late in the day, Femi” I hear you thinking. But is it? Some tax planning should happen before the end of the tax year; but the start of a new tax year also presents opportunities. With many people experiencing a drastic change to their circumstances due to the pandemic, it is more important than ever to keep on top of your tax affairs.

If your income is now at a different level than pre-pandemic, you need to re-evaluate any previous tax planning. For example:

  • Child benefit – A claim may now be worthwhile if income is below £60,000. Act soon to benefit from a full claim for 2021/22.
  • Marriage allowance – A claim may now be possible if neither you nor your spouse/civil partner is a higher rate taxpayer. You can claim for 2021/22 or backdate a claim for three years.
  • Working from home – Employees can claim a £26 per month deduction if required to work from home. Claim for 2021/22 or backdate a claim to 2020/21. Although the tax year 2020/21 has ended, some carry backs are possible. Gift Aid donations and SEIS/EIS investments made during the current tax year can all be carried back.

Investments

Savings rates hit record lows last year, and many companies cut their dividend payments. You may also have used up savings to replace lost income. Therefore, make sure you and your partner are making the best use of the savings and dividend allowances, and decide whether any ISA saving is still the best option.

You might also have had to realise investments during 2020/21. If you are now facing a CGT bill, it might be possible to crystallise some capital losses to offset against the gains. This is done by making a negligible value claim for assets that have become virtually worthless.

Tax payments

Some simple procedural checks can make a difference:

  • Employees – Check your PAYE codes for 2021/22. Your allowance might be too low if deductions have increased (such as professional subscriptions) or taxable investment income has fallen.
  • Self-employed – If profits have fallen, you might be able to reduce payments on account. This will reduce the payment coming up in July, as well as obtain a refund from this January’s payment.

A good starting point when reviewing your tax affairs is HMRC’s income tax webpage. This contains many useful links and can be found here.

Photo by airfocus on Unsplash

The Spring 2021 Budget – still some surprises

A quiet turning of the tax screw.

Just before the Budget arrived on 3 March, it seemed as if the Chancellor would have nothing to say that was not already public knowledge. However, while some of the torrent of leaks were confirmed, none of the pre-Budget pundits correctly predicted the Chancellor’s strategy. Instead of cutting borrowing, Mr Sunak increased it sharply in 2021/22 over the estimates produced just four months earlier in his Spending Review.

The Chancellor’s approach was:

  • To stimulate investment in the next two years with extremely generous allowances. In effect, for every £1,000 a company invests in new plant and machinery, the government will reduce their corporate tax bill by £247.
  • To pay for this largesse and start to repair public finances:
    • From April 2023, when the enhanced investment allowances end, the rate of corporation tax for companies with profits of at least £250,000 will jump by 6%, from 19% to 25%.
    • Many personal tax thresholds, bands and allowances will be frozen until the end of 2025/26.

The big freeze of everything from the pensions lifetime allowance to the inheritance tax nil rate band counts as a stealth tax. Look at the raw numbers and there is no increase in tax – everything stays the same. In practice, the effect of inflation will take its toll. As incomes and wealth rise, thresholds are crossed and tax bands filled more quickly. More people become taxpayers and all taxpayers pay more tax.

A good (or possibly bad) example is the inheritance tax nil rate band, which was set at its current £325,000 level (now running through to 2026) way back in April 2009. Had the band been linked to the CPI inflation index, it would be about £90,000 higher in 2021/22. That difference equates to an extra £36,000 in inheritance tax at the standard 40% rate.

In other words, you may think you were spared higher tax bills by the Chancellor, but that is not necessarily the case. Tax planning is still important and will become more so as the freeze drags on to 2026.

Photo by Diane Helentjaris on Unsplash

Is A Wealth Tax A Viable Option for The Chancellor?

The Wealth Tax Commission, an independent body of tax experts, has set out the framework for a one-off wealth tax.  Will the Chancellor be tempted to adopt this?

In his November [2020] statement, in which Chancellor Rishi Sunak highlighted that the government was spending £280 billion this financial year on coping with the Covid-19 pandemic, he is also said:

[W]e have a responsibility, once the economy recovers, to return to a sustainable fiscal position.”

A wealth tax is one way that has been suggested to repay at least part of the massive debt that has accumulated. The idea was given a boost in December when a 125-page report detailing how a wealth tax could operate was published by the Wealth Tax Commission, which is independent of government. Its main proposals were:

  • The tax should be a one-off, levied at the rate of 5% on individual wealth above £500,000.
  • The definition of wealth would include all So, for example, there would be none of the special reliefs for pensions, farmland or business assets that currently apply under inheritance tax.
  • The valuation date would be on or shortly before the first formal announcement of the tax, to prevent post-announcement forestalling actions. The value of housing and land would in the first instance be calculated by HMRC’s Valuation Office Agency (VOA).
  • In practice the tax payment would normally be at the rate of 1% (plus nominal interest) for five years.
  • Deferred payments could be made by asset-rich, cash-poor individuals. For pensions, payment would be drawn from the tax-free lump sum, when benefits are drawn.

The Commission estimated that such a tax would raise a net £260 billion. It would be payable by 8.25 million people, meaning it would reach many who pay income tax at no more than basic rate.

It should be noted that earlier in the year, (in July 2020 to be exact), Rishi Sunak had said, “I do not believe that now is the time, or ever would be the time, for a wealth tax”. However, as several commentators have noted, the Commission’s report has given the Chancellor cover to increase revenue from two related taxes he currently has under review – capital gains tax and inheritance tax.

Photo by Toa Heftiba on Unsplash

Is An Increase in Capital Gains Tax Inevitable?

A recent report could herald changes to capital gains tax.

Last July the Chancellor asked the Office of Tax Simplification (OTS) to undertake a review of capital gains tax (CGT) “in relation to individuals and smaller companies”. The request was something of a surprise for two reasons. Firstly, there had been no suggestion that Mr Sunak wanted to reform capital gains tax. Secondly, two earlier reports on another capital tax, inheritance tax, had been sitting in the Treasury’s in-tray for over a year, awaiting attention.

Cynics pointed out that while the Conservatives’ 2019 manifesto promised no increases to the rates of income tax, VAT and national insurance, there was no such protection for CGT. Certainly, the ideas put forward by the OTS would raise extra revenue for the Treasury’s depleted coffers, but probably not the £14bn seen in some of the November headlines.

The OTS made eleven proposals for the government to consider. The more significant were:

  • CGT rates should be more closely aligned with income tax rates, implying the maximum tax rate on most gains could rise from 20% to 45%.
  • The annual exempt amount, currently £12,300 of gains, should be reduced to a ‘true de minimis level’ of between £2,000 and £4,000.

When inheritance tax relief applies to an asset, there should be no automatic resetting of CGT base values at death, as currently occurs. The OTS also suggested that the government should consider whether to end all rebasing at death, meaning that the person inheriting an asset would be treated as acquiring it at the base cost of the person who has died.

The £1m Business Asset Disposal Relief, which only replaced the £10m Entrepreneurs’ Relief in March 2020, should itself be replaced with a new relief more focused on retirement.

The OTS paper underlines just how favourably capital gains are currently treated relative to income. As the tax year end approaches the report is also a reminder to examine your use-it-or-lose-it options for the 2020/21 annual exemption.

Photo by Kelly Sikkema on Unsplash

 

What Now, Autumn Budget?

So, the Autumn Budget has been pushed into spring 2021, with tax rises on the cards. What should we expect in the Spring Budget?

With intense speculation around tax rises to pay for the raft of Covid-19 support measures, the first serious clue to a possible Autumn Budget delay emerged on 8 September, when the Office of Tax Simplification (OTS) slipped out a statement about its review of capital gains tax (CGT), which had been commissioned by the Chancellor in July. The statement announced the response deadline on the technical part of the OTS consultation would be deferred by four weeks, to 9 November. This was a surprising move as the OTS CGT report was expected to feed into the Autumn Budget.

Soon after, the Chancellor himself issued a brief written statement saying he had asked the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) to prepare an economic and fiscal forecast ‘to be published in mid-to-late November’. The vagueness surrounding the timing was evident, as the OBR report is produced alongside the Budget and incorporates costings for Budget measures.

What had started to look inevitable was confirmed on 24 September when the Treasury cancelled the Autumn Budget. The Chancellor will still have a set piece event towards the end of the year; not only is there the OBR report to present, but Mr Sunak must also publish a Spending Review. The latter was also a victim of the general election and ought to have been produced a year ago to cover the three years from April 2020. Instead, the then Chancellor published a one-year Spending Round. Given the pandemic uncertainties, it is likely that Mr Sunak will take a similar short-term view, rather than introduce a multi-year plan.

The postponement of the Autumn Budget does not mean the spectre of tax increases has also evaporated. The level of government borrowing (£174 billion in the first five months of 2020/21) makes tax rises virtually inevitable. However, the Chancellor has afforded you more time to plan and take action in areas such as CGT and pension contributions.

Any thoughts?

Photo by Steve Johnson on Unsplash

Pop Quiz on Capital Gains Tax

HMRC has published some interesting research into capital gains tax (CGT).

Here are three CGT questions for you to ponder:

  1. How many individuals made enough capital gains in 2018/19 to face a CGT bill?

The answer is just 256,000, according to the latest provisional figures from HMRC – 9,000 fewer than in the previous tax year. Viewed another way, that is less than 1% of all income taxpayers. However, over the 10 years since 2008/09 the number of CGT payers has nearly doubled.

Now you know that individual CGT payers numbered only about a quarter of a million, try the next question…

  1. How much tax did they have to pay in total?

The answer is £8,805m, which is over £3,400m more than was collected in inheritance tax (IHT) in 2018/19. IHT and CGT are both capital taxes, often levied on the same asset, albeit usually at different times. Yet CGT attracts much less criticism than IHT, which has been rated as the UK’s most-hated tax.

With the information on how many taxpayers and how much tax was collected, the third question might look easy…

  1. What proportion of that £8,805m was paid by the top 5,000 CGT payers?

The top 5,000 – about 2% of all CGT payers – contributed 54.4% (£4,789m) of all CGT paid. They all had gains of at least £2,000,000. Expand the band a little and 18,000 individuals, with gains of at least £500,000, accounted for just under three quarters of the CGT paid.

The answers to these three questions highlight two points which give pause for thought, one to the Chancellor and the other for investors:

  • As with some other personal taxes, the amount raised from a small number of the wealthiest individuals is a significant proportion of the total. This means that the results of increasing the tax rate(s) will heavily depend upon how those individuals react. If some of them decide not to realise their gains, the overall tax take could fall rather than rise.
  • The annual CGT exemption is £12,300 in 2020/21. Investment returns that are received as capital gains are usually taxed more lightly than those received as income. The relatively small number of taxpayers is a reminder of the current generosity of the exemption.

Photo by Felicia Buitenwerf on Unsplash

Who pays capital gains tax?

HMRC has published some interesting research into capital gains tax (CGT).

Here are three CGT questions for you to ponder:

  1. How many individuals made enough capital gains in 2018/19 to face a CGT bill?

The answer is just 256,000, according to the latest provisional figures from HMRC – 9,000 fewer than in the previous tax year. Viewed another way, that is less than 1% of all income taxpayers. However, over the 10 years since 2008/09 the number of CGT payers has nearly doubled.

Now you know that individual CGT payers numbered only about a quarter of a million, try the next question…

  1. How much tax did they have to pay in total?

The answer is £8,805m, which is over £3,400m more than was collected in inheritance tax (IHT) in 2018/19. IHT and CGT are both capital taxes, often levied on the same asset, albeit usually at different times. Yet CGT attracts much less criticism than IHT, which has been rated as the UK’s most-hated tax.

With the information on how many taxpayers and how much tax was collected, the third question might look easy…

  1. What proportion of that £8,805m was paid by the top 5,000 CGT payers?

The top 5,000 – about 2% of all CGT payers – contributed 54.4% (£4,789m) of all CGT paid. They all had gains of at least £2,000,000. Expand the band a little and 18,000 individuals, with gains of at least £500,000, accounted for just under three quarters of the CGT paid.

The answers to these three questions highlight two points which give pause for thought, one to the Chancellor and the other for investors:

  • As with some other personal taxes, the amount raised from a small number of the wealthiest individuals is a significant proportion of the total. This means that the results of increasing the tax rate(s) will heavily depend upon how those individuals react. If some of them decide not to realise their gains, the overall tax take could fall rather than rise.
  • The annual CGT exemption is £12,300 in 2020/21. Investment returns that are received as capital gains are usually taxed more lightly than those received as income. The relatively small number of taxpayers is a reminder of the current generosity of the exemption.

There. Bet that made you think?

Photo by Kelly Sikkema on Unsplash

 

Capital gains tax review new on the agenda

The Chancellor has asked the Office of Tax Simplification to review capital gains tax (CGT).

Within a week of giving his Summer Statement, the Chancellor wrote to the Office of Tax Simplification (OTS) asking it to “undertake a review of CGT and aspects of the taxation of chargeable gains in relation to individuals and smaller businesses”.  The request was unexpected and prompted some press speculation that Rishi Sunak was beginning his hunt for extra tax revenue after the unprecedented spending on Covid-19.

CGT is certainly an interesting place to start:

  • The latest data from HMRC show that there were fewer than 300,000 CGT payers in 2017/18.
  • Nearly two thirds of the tax raised in that year came from 3% of CGT payers who made gains of £1 million or more.
  • Over half of the CGT payers either paid no income tax, or paid it only at the basic rate, as the graph below shows.

The main reason why CGT payers are such a rare breed is the annual exemption. For 2020/21 this allows up to £12,300 of net gains to be realised before any tax becomes payable. Even then, the maximum tax rate is 20% (28% for residential property).

At the last election, both the Labour Party and the Liberal Democrats called for gains to be taxed at full income tax rates and for the exemption to be cut to just £1,000 or abolished. The Conservative manifesto made no comment – CGT was not one of the taxes for which a rate freeze was promised.

Neither Mr Sunak nor the OTS has put any date on when the review might be published. However, the OTS has asked for all comments to be in by 12 October, so government proposals might emerge in the Autumn Budget, particularly if that Budget appears later in the year. There is a precedent for changing CGT rates part way through a tax year – as then Chancellor George Osborne did in 2010. With this in mind, a wise precaution could be to review your portfolio and consider whether you wish to realise any gains in the next few months, while the current generous CGT regime is in place.

Photo by Markus Spiske on Unsplash