Skip to main content

Spring Statement: The Magic of £9.9 billion

There were no tax increases in the Chancellor’s Spring Statement (upgraded from an initial Spring Forecast), but that might just be pain deferred.

Before becoming Chancellor, Rachel Reeves set out a new goal for the public finances, now badged the ‘Stability Rule’. In simple terms, this requires the Government should at least match its day-to-day expenditure with what it receives in tax and other revenue. In 2024/25, the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) projects there will be a shortfall under this rule (technically a current budget account deficit) of £60.7 billion. Following past government tradition of fiscal targets, the Chancellor has set a five-year goal taking us to 2029/30.

When Rachel Reeves presented her Budget last October, the OBR projected that she would meet her Stability Rule with £9.9 billion to spare. However five months later, the OBR recalculated the margin (often called headroom) in preparation for the Spring Statement and concluded that, with no changes, the Rule would be missed by £4.1 billion – a £14 billion reversal.

Given that the margin of £9.9 billion (about 0.7% of total government expenditure) proved inadequate last time, it is surprising that the new headroom figure is also £9.9 billion. This is despite the raft of Spring Statement measures – mostly spending cuts. The apparent circularity of the Spring Statement process has prompted speculation that the large cuts to welfare benefits were tailored to fit the Stability Rule, rather than wholly founded in encouraging more people into work.

The problem with maintaining a small £9.9 billion headroom is that when the OBR’s next assessment arrives in the autumn, there is a similar risk of missing the Stability Rule once again. The OBR’s judgement day will coincide with the Chancellor’s one ‘fiscal event’ of the year – the Autumn Budget. A second miss would probably see Reeves turn to tax increases rather than more spending cuts to recover the situation.

There were already signs of preparation for such a move in the Spring Statement. For example, hidden in the main document was a comment about reviewing the balance between cash and shares in Individual Savings Accounts (ISAs). Reducing the amount that could be placed in cash ISAs would yield extra revenue, because it would mean less tax relief being given.

It seems likely that, as happened in 2024, speculation about tax rises will get underway before summer begins. Taking time to focus on your financial planning over the next few months could be more important than ever. You have been warned.

Photo by Frames For Your Heart on Unsplash

New tax year planning

The start of the new tax year warrants as much planning as the end of the old tax year.

While the end of the tax year on 5 April is a major focus of tax planning, it doesn’t end there. The following day may require much less immediate attention, but there is an argument for considering it to be just as important. For example:

  • Personal allowances The personal allowance for 2025/26, the new tax year, remains at £12,570, the same as it has been since 2021/22. Above that level, income tax will normally enter the equation. If you (or your spouse/civil partner) do not have enough income to cover the personal allowance, then you could consider transferring investments between yourselves so that the income generated escapes tax. You should also consider whether or not to claim the marriage allowance if your partner pays no tax and you pay no more than the basic rate (or vice versa).
  • At the opposite end of the income scale, once your income (after certain deductions) exceeds £100,000, you start losing your personal allowance at the rate of £1 for each £2 of excess. In those circumstances, a transfer of investments and the income generated can also make sense – this time by reducing your taxable
  • Other tax allowances and bands Similar principles apply to other allowances, such as the personal savings allowance (up to £1,000), the dividend allowance (£500) and the thresholds of tax bands. It is much easier to shuffle around future income at the start of the tax year than attempt to do so as 5 April looms near.
  • High income child benefit charge (HICBC) If you or your partner (marriage is irrelevant) have income (after certain allowances) of over £60,000 and both claim and receive payments of child benefit, then whichever of you has the higher income is taxed on that benefit. The tax charge is 1% of the child benefit for each £200 of income over the £60,000 threshold, meaning the tax matches the benefit at £80,000. If you have two children, this is equivalent to an extra 11.26% added to your marginal tax rate. Shifting your investment income could therefore save tax, even if you both pay the same marginal rate of tax.

For more details on these and other new tax year opportunities, please talk to us – as with year-end planning, the sooner, the better.

Photo by Maxime Horlaville on Unsplash

What to expect from the Spring Forecast on 26 March

The Chancellor has announced the timing of her next formal report to Parliament.

Cast your mind back six Chancellors ago to Philip Hammond (aka Spreadsheet Phil). In autumn 2016, Hammond announced a change to the timings of Budget announcements, with a Spring Budget and Autumn Pre-Budget Report (PBR) to be replaced by an Autumn Budget and a Spring Statement. His aim was to move away from what had virtually become two Budgets a year, with the PBR introducing as many – if not more – tax changes than the real thing.

The new scheduling was welcomed by the likes of the Institute for Government, but fell victim to events, notably general elections and the Covid-19 pandemic. Since 2017, there have been as many Spring Budgets as Autumn Budgets and in one year (2022) when there was only (and notoriously) one unofficial mini-Budget presented by Kwasi Kwarteng. In her March 2024 Mais Lecture, Rachel Reeves made clear that were she to become Chancellor she would revert to Hammond’s schedule and have only one major ‘fiscal event’ each year, that is, an Autumn Budget.

That still leaves a Spring statement of some sort, not least because the Office of Budget Responsibility (OBR) is required by law to produce two reports each fiscal year on the state of the economy and the government’s finances. Shortly before Christmas, the Treasury announced that the 2025 ‘Spring Forecast’ would be presented to Parliament on 26 March, the day that the OBR’s report is to be published.

While the accompanying press release did not rule out any tax changes in March, it did say, “The Chancellor remains committed to one major fiscal event a year to give families and businesses stability and certainty on upcoming tax and spending changes”. Those words and the continued debate from last October’s Budget both point to no new tax measures being revealed on 26 March, even if the OBR numbers are disappointing. However, in January this year, after government borrowing costs rose, rumours were beginning to appear that spending cuts were in the offing.

The probable absence of tax changes is good news as we enter the season of planning for the tax year end and the start of a new tax year. The £40 billion of tax increases in autumn last year can only mean that tax year planning is particularly important for 2025.

Photo by Solen Feyissa on Unsplash

For better or worse? The corporate tax roadmap

As part of the October Budget, the government published a ‘corporate tax roadmap’, outlining a commitment to maintaining corporate tax rates for the duration of this parliament. This provides businesses with welcome certainty going forward, although the existing increased rates of corporation tax introduced in 2023 remain a source of disquiet.

The government’s intention with publishing the corporate tax roadmap is that a stable and predictable tax environment will help to provide the confidence companies need to invest, innovate and grow over the long term.

Main commitment

The government has left itself the option of cutting the main rate of corporation tax should this be necessary to keep the UK’s tax regime competitive. This includes:

  • Rate of corporation tax: The main rate will be capped at 25%, with the small profits rate and marginal relief kept at their current rates and thresholds.
  • Capital allowances: The system of 100% and 50% first-year allowances on new plant and machinery expenditure will be maintained, as will the £1 million annual investment allowance threshold and the structures and buildings allowance.
  • R&D reliefs: The current rates for both the merged research and development (R&D) expenditure credit scheme and enhanced R&D intensive support for small- to medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) will be maintained.
  • Loss reliefs: The current loss reliefs for both standalone companies and groups will remain in place.

Potential improvements

The roadmap also highlights areas of corporate tax where the government will explore possible improvements. One particular area of concern is the tax treatment of predevelopment costs. A recent Upper Tribunal decision was that the cost of preliminary studies performed prior to the installation of wind turbines did not qualify for capital allowances.

Not surprisingly, this decision has caused uncertainty for investors and a follow-up consultation will be launched in the coming months. The Upper Tribunal’s decision does not match the government’s aim of encouraging investment in renewable energy.

The full text of the government’s corporate tax roadmap can be found here.

Photo by Karsten Würth on Unsplash

Long freeze on individual savings accounts

Hidden away in the October Budget announcements was the freezing of individual savings accounts (ISA) annual subscription limits until 5 April 2030. Good news that there is no intention to remove this valuable tax-free savings option, but bad news given the fiscal drag involved.

The main £20,000 ISA allowance has been in place since 6 April 2017 and will remain unchanged for a further five tax years.

Other subscription limits

The following annual subscription limits are also going to be frozen until 5 April 2030:

  Subscription limit
Lifetime ISAs £4,000
Junior ISAs £9,000
Child trust funds (CTFs) £9,000

The subscription limit of £20,000 applies across the four main adult ISAs each tax year – the cash ISA, the stocks and shares ISA, the innovative finance ISA and the Lifetime ISA. Although the Lifetime ISA has a £4,000 subscription limit, this is still part of the overall £20,000 allowance.

There were concerns that the Chancellor was going to impose an overall limit on the amount of ISA saving, but the mooted lifetime cap of £500,000 did not materialise. There are currently over 4,000 ISA savers with ISA pots worth more than £1 million.

There were plans to introduce a UK ISA (or British ISA) with an additional £5,000 allowance, but the Chancellor has announced this idea will not proceed.

Fractional interests

Despite previously saying the complete opposite, HMRC have confirmed that fractional interests – commonly known as fractional shares – can be held within a stocks or shares ISA or a CTF invested in shares:

  • The shares of some US tech companies – such as Apple and Microsoft – can cost £100s. The availability of fractional interests will help regular savers acquire such shares.
  • The change will not come in immediately, but, subject to complying with the new regulations, existing fractional interests may be retained.

ISA managers will be required to remove any currently held fractional interests that are not eligible under the new regulations. HMRC’s basic guide to ISAs can be found here.

Photo by Diane Helentjaris on Unsplash

Business rates worth the relief?

Business rates relief has been extended for the retail, hospitality and leisure sector but, with the rate of discount cut from 75% to 40%, many English businesses will face a near doubling of their rates bill for 2025/26.

Next year’s changes for 2025/26

Retail, hospitality and leisure properties not qualifying for small business rates relief currently receive a 75% business rates discount, subject to a cap of £110,000 per business. This relief is to continue for 2025/26, but with the rate of discount cut to 40%:

  • A business rates bill consists of a property’s rateable value multiplied by a multiplier.
  • For 2025/26, the small business multiplier (rateable value below £51,000) is again frozen at 49.9p. This covers over a million properties in England.
  • The standard multiplier (rateable value £51,000 or more) is being uprated from 54.6p to 55.5p.

On the one hand, businesses will be relieved that the business rates discount will not cease altogether on 31 March 2025. However, on the other, they will be disappointed with the level of replacement discount.

Property will typically qualify for the 40% discount if the business is mainly being used as a shop; restaurant, café, bar or pub; cinema or music venue; or gym, spa or hotel.

2026/27 onwards

With the aim of implementing a fairer system of business rates, permanently lower multipliers will be introduced for retail, hospitality and leisure properties with a rateable value below £500,000:

  • This reduction will be funded by a new higher multiplier for properties with a rateable value of £500,000 or higher.
  • The higher multiplier will include most large distribution warehouses, including those used by online retailers.

The Government will also be consulting on other areas for reform. For example, where the presence of cliff-edges in the system acts as a disincentive to expand.

There are currently no details yet of any discounts for property in Scotland, Wales or Northern Ireland, nor have multipliers been announced. Welsh retail, hospitality and leisure property currently benefits from a 40% discount.

Details of the business rates reliefs currently available in England can be found here.

Photo by Aarón Blanco Tejedor on Unsplash

The Autumn Budget – a brave new tax world

Chancellor Rachel Reeves’ first Budget was a significant one in all senses.

“…this Budget delivers a large, sustained increase in spending, taxation, and borrowing.”

So said the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) in the first paragraph of its overview of the Autumn Budget. The numbers are indeed large:

  • spending is up by almost £70 billion a year over the next five years;
  • taxation will rise by £36 billion a year; and
  • borrowing will still be above £70 billion a year in 2029/30.

The Chancellor’s tax-raising opportunities were constrained by the Labour manifesto pledges to hold the rates of income tax, VAT, corporation tax and national insurance contributions (NICs) – only for employees, although other interpretations are available. The result was that other taxes had to carry the burden of providing extra funds for the Treasury:

  • Over half the additional revenue came from changes to employer’s NICs from 2025/26. These saw the class 1 employer rate rise from 13.8% to 15.0%, and the starting point for payments fall from £9,100 of annual earnings to £5,000. The impact of this was mitigated slightly by a £5,500 increase to £10,500 in the employment allowance – effectively an employer NIC credit.
  • The main capital gains tax rates have increased from 10% to 18% (for non-taxpayers and basic rate taxpayers) and from 20% to 24% (for higher and additional rate taxpayers). The rate for business assets disposal relief will rise from 10% to 14% in 2025/26 and then 18% in the following tax year, with the maximum amount of lifetime relievable gain staying at £1 million.
  • Inheritance tax (IHT) relief for businesses and agricultural property will be cut back from April 2026, with the relief for qualifying shares listed on the Alternative Investment Market halved to 50%.
  • Death benefits from pensions will be brought into IHT from 2027/28, although there were none of the other tax changes that had been rumoured in the weeks before the Budget. Notably full income tax relief on contributions remains and employer contributions continue to be free of NICs.

If you could be affected by any of these changes (or further changes not mentioned in this update), make sure that you seek advice. The sooner you are prepared for this new, higher tax environment, the better.

Photo by Nicolas Spehler on Unsplash

How to raise £10,000,000,000

With a ‘black hole’ of £22 billion to fill, there are plenty of groups giving Rachel Reeves advice.

The Fabian Society published a report on taxation on August Bank Holiday Monday. While their main audience is in Scotland, which has its summer bank holiday at the start of August rather than at the end, the timing was unusual. Nevertheless, that was the date chosen by the Fabian Society to release Expensive and Unequal. The case for reforming pension tax (2024).

The Fabian Society is one of the Labour party’s original founders and remains an affiliate to this day. Like several other left-leaning think tanks, post-election what it says has suddenly started to attract more attention. This is especially true on the issue of tax ahead of the Budget on 30 October.

The Society’s pension proposals are wide-ranging, but all of them have appeared before in one form or another. Taken together, the Society suggests that they could raise £10 billion a year. To put that in context, the controversial decision to means-test Winter Fuel Payments will save about £1.5 billion a year in 2025/26.

The most significant element of the proposals is the introduction of a flat rate tax credit to replace income tax relief on pension contributions. This idea was once allegedly considered by George Osborne, the former Conservative chancellor. For example:

  • At present, a higher-rate taxpayer (42% in Scotland, 40% elsewhere in the UK) pays £60 (£58 in Scotland) to add £100 to their pension.
  • Alternatively, the Fabian Society suggests a personal contribution of £75 from net income would receive a £25 government tax credit, bringing the total to £100. This is similar to a Lifetime Individual Savings Account.

Such a reform would benefit most taxpayers, who would see the net cost of their pension contributions drop. It would also reduce the tax benefit given to higher and additional rate taxpayers, who according to the most recent HMRC calculations (for 2022/23) receive just over half of all pension contribution tax relief.

Most of the Fabian Society’s tax-raising ideas were likely already under consideration by the Treasury. Regardless of whether they are included in the Budget on 30 October, they are worth noting if you are contemplating topping up your pension.

Find out more about the Fabian Society’s report here.

Photo by Mark Timberlake on Unsplash

Capital gains tax receipts

Raising tax rates is a traditional government strategy to increase tax receipts for HMRC, but this may not be the case for capital gains tax (CGT). This is because taxpayers generally have more control over when gains are realised.

The upcoming Budget at the end of October is widely expected to see a hike in CGT rates. However, recently published data from HMRC suggests that the 4% higher rate reduction from 6 April 2024 (28% down to 24%) on residential property disposals may have helped to increase tax receipts as landlords could be taking a good opportunity to sell up.

For the five months to 31 August 2024, CGT receipts increased by nearly 10% compared to the year before.

Take care to plan ahead

Compared to landlords, those with an investment portfolio have more opportunity for CGT planning since they have considerable flexibility over the timing of disposals. However, there is now somewhat less scope for basic CGT planning with the annual exempt amount cut to just £3,000:

  • With an investment portfolio, disposals can be spread over several years to make use of multiple annual exempt amounts and basic rate tax bands. Couples can also make use of the annual exempt amounts and basic rate tax bands of a spouse or civil partner. Such strategies should be used with care, however, as this type of planning will unravel if CGT rates increase in the future.
  • Making personal pension contributions in the same year as a disposal will increase the basic rate tax band.
  • More sophisticated investors might consider investing in a seed enterprise investment scheme. With 50% income tax relief and CGT exemption on 50% of a reinvested gain, a landlord could currently benefit from total tax relief of 64%. This relief will increase in line with any future uplift of CGT rates. These investments are high risk and advice should be taken before engaging in them.

Longer term, those with a large investment portfolio might be able to avoid any tax liability if they retire overseas. This option does not work for landlords because UK property remains subject to CGT regardless of the owner’s residence status.

HMRC’s guide to capital gains tax (what you pay it on, rates and allowances) can be found here.

Photo by Mathieu Stern on Unsplash

Will increased capital gains tax (CGT) mean less tax gets paid?

Capital gains tax: a minority sport?

The Labour Party’s 2024 manifesto said, ‘We will not increase National Insurance, the basic, higher, or additional rates of Income Tax, or VAT.’ The absence of any comment on CGT meant that Rachel Reeves received persistent questions during the election campaign about a possible increase. Unsurprisingly, there was no definitive answer.

At the beginning of August, HMRC published new data about how much CGT had raised. The figures were for 2022/23, when the annual exemption was £12,300 of gains, as opposed to the current £3,000. Nevertheless, they provide some interesting information about who pays how much:

  • Only 348,000 people made enough capital gains to pay the tax. That is about 1% of the number of income taxpayers.
  • The total amount of CGT paid by individuals was £13.63 billion, with trusts accounting for another £0.797 billion.
  • 2,000 taxpayers – less than 1% of all CGT payers (who realised at least £5 million of gains) – paid 41% of all CGT collected from individuals. Another 4,000 taxpayers with gains between £2 million and £5 million paid 16% of the total.
  • There was more tax paid in the previous two tax years. Between 2021/22 and 2022/23 the Exchequer’s receipts fell by 15%.

That final bullet point deserves an explanation, because it is unusual for tax receipts to fall year-on-year, yet alone for two years. In July 2020, the then chancellor Rishi Sunak, commissioned the now-defunct Office of Tax Simplification (OTS) to review CGT. The move prompted speculation that CGT would be increased, a sentiment that was reinforced when the OTS suggested aligning CGT rates with income tax and sharply reducing the annual exemption. The predictable result was a pre-emptive rush to realise gains, boosting CGT payments.

In the event, Mr Sunak ignored the OTS proposals, although subsequently one of his many successors did take up the idea of cutting the annual exemption. As we wait to see what will be in Rachel Reeves’ Budget on 30 October, the story of CGT receipts may have provided her with an interesting lesson: hints of raising the tax are enough in itself to generate extra revenue.

Source HMRC