Skip to main content

Month: August 2021

HMRC: Upper Tribunal deems child benefit discovery assessments invalid

A discovery assessment can be made by HMRC where income, which should have been assessed, has not been assessed for tax purposes. A recent decision in an Upper Tribunal case, however, found that neither child benefit, nor the related charge, is defined as income, thereby restricting HMRC’s use of discovery assessments to collect underpaid tax.

The high income child benefit charge (HICBC) applies to anyone who receives child benefit when their income, or their partner’s income, exceeds £50,000. Many have been caught out thinking the charge doesn’t apply to them or because they are unaware of their partner’s finances.

Individuals who pay tax under PAYE may never have needed to fill in a tax return. However, they are required to do so just to report the HICBC.

The decision

Jason Wilkes owed around £4,200 in unpaid taxes as a result of being subject to the HICBC for the tax years 2014/15 to 2016/17. Crucial to the decision was that Wilkes had not filed returns for these years or been issued with a notice to file.

HMRC raised discovery assessments to collect the tax due. However, since no income as such was ‘discovered’, the assessments raised were invalid.

Refunds all round?

The answer, sadly, is no. Discovery assessments are valid if tax returns have been submitted but the HICBC omitted; there is then ‘income’. This will be the case for many taxpayers.

It seems unfair that those complying with the law are at a disadvantage to those who have not. However, this is down to HMRC relying on discovery assessments rather than issuing a notice to file tax returns.

If you have been required to pay the HICBC for prior years then check to see if you fit the refund criteria: tax returns not filed, with discovery assessments used to collect the tax due.

Details of the high income child benefit charge can be found here. Let me know if you’d like to know more – or require assistance in this space.

Photo by Noble Mitchell on Unsplash

 

 

Probate fees reform, round three

The Government’s third attempt at revamping the cost of obtaining grant of probate in England and Wales is much more modest in scope than the previous two. The introduction of the new fee structure is planned for early 2022.

Proposal

There is a two-tier fee structure under the current system. The cost is £215 for an application from an individual, and £155 if the application is from a solicitor. Fees were last amended seven years ago, and at that time the cost differential reflected some of the additional administrative work required by the probate service to process applications made by individuals.

  • The cost differential between professional and individual applications has substantially reduced, so the latest proposal is to have a single fee of £273; considerably less than the £20,000 maximum suggested back in 2016, or £6,000 in 2018.
  • No fee is payable for very small estates of £5,000 or less.
  • The same fees apply for obtaining letters of administration where the deceased was intestate.

Probate

Many estates do not need to go through probate. In some cases the value of the deceased’s assets is low. The cut-off point can be anything between £10,000 and £50,000. Each bank and financial organisation has its own rules on how much money it will release before seeing a grant of probate. If all assets are jointly owned, they automatically pass to the surviving owners.

Even when probate is required, you can save the high fees charged by probate specialists if the estate is uncomplicated; approximately 40% of applications for probate are made by individuals in such circumstances. The Death Notification Service lets you notify a number of financial institutions of a person’s death at the same time, and My Lost Account will help trace lost bank and building society accounts, and also NS&I products. It is worth obtaining multiple copies of a death certificate from the beginning as the cost of requesting these later can go up.

Because of Covid-19, probate applications are taking up to eight weeks to process.

If you are involved in a probate application, the government’s guide is a good starting point, otherwise, give me a call.

Photo by Melinda Gimpel on Unsplash

Changes afoot for Basis period tax rules

Although it looks like the next Budget will be pushed back to spring 2022, several tax changes are already on the cards, some more certain than others. The government’s fast progress with reform of the basis period rules for unincorporated businesses has taken some by surprise.

Basis period rules

The basis of taxation for sole traders and partnerships looks like it will change to a tax year basis from 2023/24 onwards. The government’s plan is to simplify the rules by the time MTD for income tax becomes mandatory.

This will not impact on you if you already draw up accounts to 5 April (or 31 March), but for others 2022/23 will be the transition year.

Example

A partnership prepares accounts to 30 June. The profits assessed for 2022/23 will be those from 1 July 2021 to 5 April 2023 (or 31 March 2023), less any unused overlap profits. For 2023/24, profits assessed will be from 6 April 2023 to 5 April 2024 (or 1 April 2023 to 31 March 2024). Profits for the years ended 30 June 2023 and 2024 will have to be apportioned.

Any unused overlap profits can be offset in 2022/23, although some will find themselves taxed on up to 23 months of profits with little overlap profits to offset. In this case, an election will be possible so that the additional profits are spread over five tax years.

The need to apportion profits in future will mean having to estimate figures (with a subsequent amendment) where the second set of accounts is not prepared in time for the 31 January self- assessment deadline.

The simplest solution will be to change to a 5 April (or 31 March) accounting date. Making that change in 2021/22 could be a good option if current profits are low due to Covid-19.

Another change already on the cards is the increase to the normal retirement age for registered pensions from 55 to 57 in April 2028, which will be legislated in the Finance Act 2021/22. Less certain is a proposed 1% increase in NICs for the employed and self-employed to fund social care.

The Government’s policy paper on basis period reform can be found here.

Photo by Ross Findon on Unsplash

MTD income tax pilot

The pilot scheme for Making Tax Digital (MTD) for income tax is now open for self-employed workers and landlords. The scheme becomes mandatory for accounting periods commencing on or after 6 April 2023, so those who join now will get ahead of the game.

The first phase of MTD for income tax will be mandatory if your taxable turnover from self-employment or income from property is above £10,000. If you want to be one of the early adopters in the pilot scheme, there are various conditions that you will need to meet.

Who can join?

You can only join if you are a sole trader with income from just one business, a landlord renting out UK property, or both. If you need to report income from other sources, such as employment, pensions, or capital gains, then you cannot currently join. The other conditions should not be a problem for most:

  • UK resident;
  • registered for self assessment, and
  • up to date with tax returns and payments.

Your accountant can sign you up if you make a request.

Digital records

To join the pilot, you will need to use software that is compatible with MTD for income tax. Be warned that only five fully compatible products covering both self-employment and property are currently listed by HMRC, although this includes two with free versions.

You’ll need to keep digital records of all your business income and expenses, starting from the beginning of the accounting period you sign up for, and send updates to HMRC. At the end of the period, you will submit a final declaration instead of a self-assessment tax return.

If you’re already using software to keep records, you should almost certainly wait for your provider to update their product to be compatible with MTD for income tax rather than switching providers just to join the pilot scheme. HMRC’s list of software compatible with MTD for income tax can be found here.

Photo by Shahadat Rahman on Unsplash 

What is an adequate retirement income?

A leading pension think tank has examined this question – but the findings aren’t straightforward.

Over the years, there has been much focus on the tax treatment of pensions and ways to encourage greater saving for retirement. Arguably, there has been less attention paid to the question of how much income you will need once work ceases.

The Pension Policy Institute (PPI) recently published a paper examining what an adequate retirement income means today in dollar terms. The paper notes that the last serious effort to address the issue was undertaken by the Pensions Commission nearly two decades ago, leading eventually to the introduction of automatic enrolment. The PPI makes the following points:

  • Individuals, employers, the state and society generally all have differing views on what constitutes adequacy. For example, the state view is set by the Guarantee Credit element of Pension Credit (£177.10 a week for a single person and £270.30 for a couple).
  • Changes to the pensions landscape since 2000 have altered the retirement picture both positively and negatively. For example, the new state pension is higher than its basic state pension predecessor, but state pension age has increased (to 66 for men and women) and will continue to increase.
  • The demands made on assets originally saved to provide a retirement income have increased, for example:
    • For some people, there is a widening gap between leaving work and receiving their state pension, a situation exacerbated by pandemic-prompted early retirements.
    • More often now debts, including mortgages, will be carried over into retirement.
    • The shrinking of home ownership will see more retirees having to pay rent; and
    • There may be a need to support other family members – the Bank of Mum and Dad may not be able to close at retirement.
  • The traditional emphasis on retirement income ignores the need to deal with ‘personal financial shocks’, which are better addressed by considering retirement capital.

The PPI says that many people make their retirement planning decisions ‘without support’. It goes on to warn that “As a result, many people struggle to make pensions and savings decisions which offer them the best chance of both achieving their aspirations for retirement and protecting themselves against future risk.” Don’t let that be you – talk to us about assessing what an adequate retirement income means for you and how it can be achieved.

Photo by Diana Parkhouse on Unsplash